Prior to 9-11-2001 I had very little interest in Islam. I knew that it was a belief and practice of muslims to murder those who decided to become apostates and that the origin of this practice was from Mohammad himself. Aside from the attacks on our soldiers in Lebanon at the military barracks and other incidents like the Iranian hostage crisis, both of which angered me, Islam and Muslims didn’t really matter that much to me. They were over there in the crazy Middle East and I was here in America. The attacks on the Twin Towers changed all that for me and since that day, I have done a lot of research on Islam. I am not writing this post concerning what I have learned about Islam, no, instead I think what is more important to focus on is the response of Western nations to those attacks and many more on our own home soil.

One doesn’t have to do too much research to find out why these muslims who supposedly “hijacked” the allegedly peaceful religion of Islam, never hijacked it at all. No, it’s not true at all. All the murderous deeds done by these “radical jihadists” are in fact the things that Mohammad and his companions did to those who opposed him, or even made fun of him when he didn’t have a militant gang of thugs. So the big question for me is, “why do western nations protect Islam” under the guise of “freedom of religion” when Islam has been at war with the world ever since Mohammad had a militia? Would we also protect cannibalism since it too is religiously motivated in tribal regions of the world? I should hope not. Is “freedom of religion” really tolerance of all religions even, if the religion advocates the genocide of non-adherents? Is this what law makers had in mind? You would think so based on the hate crime legislation that so many western countries have passed. If this is the case, then surely those lawmakers wanted to destroy their own nations I would think. The Law in fact is designed to discriminate against “wrong doers”. It seems that now the wrong doers are those who discriminate against murderous cults rather than the murderous cults. The end result under this kind of mentality can only be the destruction of Western Nations.

So, why would politicians in Western countries allow a flood of muslims to pour into their nations? Do they want a bigger tax base for the welfare states that have been created? Why would they want to let in a people who do not assimilate into Western nations and who have a long history of overthrowing non-Islamic governments and establishing Islamic States and Sharia law as the law of the land? I have had some morons tell me they think that “it’s their right”. Again, this is suicide. I guess people don’t love their own country anymore whether they live in Europe or America. It’s puzzling though, had they done their homework they would have found that Islamic States are extremely oppressive and the masses in those countries are poverty stricken. That’s what Islam brings, illiteracy, poverty, and death.

I guess I find myself thinking that people in Europe and America have voted or are planning to vote themselves the treasury. Take care of me from cradle to grave, who needs God and any moral absolutes, the Government is God and we can make up our own right and wrong. I find myself thinking that the only plausible explanation as to why people in power in western nations would want this to happen is a mixture of being bribed and/or they know that the welfare states they have made of western nations are doomed to failure. Socialist states are nothing more than pyramid schemes. I am certain they have crunched the numbers and know that it’s doomed to fail. And so what better way to destroy their own mismanaged governments than to allow savages in who have a history of genocide on the order of nearly 200,000 people a year since Islam was invented and to give them a “protected status” against discrimination? I know it sounds Orwellian, but it sure seems to be the piece that fits the puzzle to me. It all seems Apocalyptic to me.